Avaliação económica da segurança das barragens hidroelétricas
Evidências da França
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23882/rmd.24184Palavras-chave:
Barragens, Segurança hidráulica, Avaliação financeira, Método de custos evitadosResumo
Este artigo visa desenvolver uma abordagem económica que permita às empresas de produção de eletricidade analisar e quantificar os ganhos económicos de atividades complicadas, particularmente a segurança de barragens hidroelétricas. O método baseia-se no cálculo dos custos evitados com a implementação de mecanismo de segurança. A especificação deste método baseia-se numa sólida literatura relativa à avaliação económica do valor monetário de serviços complicados. Os resultados deste artigo destacam a importância e a influência significativa das atividades de segurança na redução de custos, atingindo cerca de 26 milhões de euros. Os resultados também esclarecem a importância do dispositivo de segurança para combater acidentes fatais e garantir a segurança pública.
Referências
Alberini, A. (2005). What is a life worth? Robustness of VSL values from contingent valuation surveys. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(4), 783-800.
Ashenfelter, O. (2006). Measuring the value of a statistical life: problems and prospects. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C10-C23.
Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment.
Barthélémy, F., Martin, X., & Nicolazo, J. L. (2004). La réglementation en matière de sécurité des barrages et des digues. Conseil général des mines.
Bateman, I. J., & Willis, K. G. (Eds.). (2001). Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Blomquist, G. C. (2004). Self-protection and averting behavior, values of statistical lives, and benefit cost analysis of environmental policy. Review of Economics of the Household, 2(1), 89-110.
Bowles, D. S., Anderson, L. R., & Glover, T. F. (1998). The practice of dam safety risk assessment and management: Its roots, its branches, and its fruit. In its Roots, its Branches, and its Fruit. Proceedings of USCOLD 1998 Annual Lecture.
Boxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L., Swait, J., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological economics, 18(3), 243-253.
Brown, C. A., & Graham, W. J. (1988). ASSESSING THE THREAT TO LIFE FROM DAM FAILURE 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 24(6), 1303-1309.
Carlsson, F., & Martinsson, P. (2001). Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41(2), 179-192.
Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., & Meade, N. F. (2001). Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and resource economics, 19(2), 173-210.
Cheng, S. T. (1993). Statistics of dam failure. Reliability and uncertainty analysis in hydraulic design. ASCE, New York, 97-105.
Cost, E. U. R. O. C. O. N. T. R. O. L. (2013). Standard Inputs for EUROCONTROL Cost Benefit Analyses.
De Blaeij, A., Florax, R. J., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. (2003). The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(6), 973-986.
DeKay, M. L., & McClelland, G. H. (1993). Predicting loss of life in cases of dam failure and flash flood. Risk Analysis, 13(2), 193-205.
Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of economic perspectives, 8(4), 19-43.
Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and resource economics, 11(3-4), 413-428.
Hartford, D. N., & Baecher, G. B. (2004). Risk and uncertainty in dam safety. Thomas Telford.
LaBelle, J. E. (2000). What do accidents truly cost? Professional Safety, 45(4), 38.
Persson, U., Norinder, A., Hjalte, K., & Gralén, K. (2001). The value of a statistical life in transport: findings from a new contingent valuation study in Sweden. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(2), 121-134.
Rico, M., Benito, G., Salgueiro, A. R., Díez-Herrero, A., & Pereira, H. G. (2008). Reported tailings dam failures: a review of the European incidents in the worldwide context. Journal of hazardous materials, 152(2), 846-852.
Salmon, G. M., & Hartford, D. N. D. (1995). Risk analysis for dam safety. In International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 6(32), 284A.
Seed, H. B., Lee, K. L., & Idriss, I. M. (1969). Analysis of Sheffield dam failure. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div.
Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 27(1), 5-76.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Mohamed Jaouad Malzi, Naoufel Belhaj , Almahdi Koraich
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
