Criatividade rizomática

Explorando os territórios inexplorados das imagens geradas por IA

Autores

  • José Manuel Simões University of Saint Joseph, Macao, China
  • Wilson Caldeira University of Saint Joseph, Macao, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23882/rmd.24228

Palavras-chave:

Imagens geradas por IA, rizoma, algoritmos, representações visuais

Resumo

Os seres humanos são invariavelmente influenciados pelos modos tecnológicos de perceção, cognição e execução, independentemente de as suas criações se relacionarem diretamente com a tecnologia. No centro da visão antropocêntrica do mundo está a construção de uma subjetividade universal, perpetuada pela dicotomia entre sujeito e objeto, entrelaçada com o tratamento da realidade nas imagens. Até a fotografia, outrora dependente da presença de um fotógrafo e de uma câmara, evoluiu para um processo rápido e omnipresente através da utilização da inteligência artificial (IA). O nosso artigo contempla as potencialidades relacionais entre a inteligência artificial generativa (IA) na criação de imagens realistas e o conceito filosófico de Deleuze/Guattari do rizoma. A imagem gerada por IA explora o que significa existir num mundo interligado por redes que produzem fotografias realistas sem referência a valores de universalidade binária, referências, símbolos ou ao aspeto do mundo.

Biografia Autor

Wilson Caldeira, University of Saint Joseph, Macao, China

Wilson Gomes Caldeira is currently a Guest Lecturer and student in the PhD program in Global Studies at the University of Saint Joseph (USJ) Macau-China, he received an MBA from the University of Saint Joseph (USJ) in 2016 and a BA in Photography from Portuguese Instituto Politécnico de Tomar in 2010. His research is focused on Artificial Intelligence and its impact on Communication processes.

wilson.caldeira@usj.edu.mo

Referências

Agnese, J., Herrera, J., Tao, H., & Zhu, X. (2020). A Survey and Taxonomy of Adversarial Neural Networks for Text‐to‐image Synthesis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1345

Balandina, E., & Peredrienko, T. (2022). Image Analysis as the Means of Cultural Representation Study in a Worldview. Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices, 19, 576–586. https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-897X-2022-19-4-576-586

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference & Repetition. Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Penguin Books.

Flusser, V. (1983). Towards a Philosophy of Photography.

Giudice, O., Guarnera, L., & Battiato, S. (2021). Fighting Deepfakes by Detecting GAN DCT Anomalies. Journal of Imaging, 7(8), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080128

Grellier, J. (2013). Rhizomatic Mapping: Spaces for Learning in Higher Education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.750280

Kosminsky, D., Walny, J., Vermeulen, J., Knudsen, S., Willett, W., & Carpendale, S. (2022). Belief at First Sight. Information Design Journal, 25(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.1.04kos

Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Cambridge, UK.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1985). Presenting the Unpresentable: The Sublime.

Mitchell, W. J. T. (1992). The Reconfigured Eye. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Moreiras, C. (2017). Joan Fontcuberta: Post-photography and the spectral image of saturation. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 2.

Parisi, L. (2013). Contagious Architecture: Computation, Aesthetics, and Space. The MIT Press.

Raaphorst, K., Duchhart, I., van der Knaap, W., Roeleveld, G., & van den Brink, A. (2016). The semiotics of landscape design communication: towards a critical visual research approach in landscape architecture. Landscape Research, 42(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1257706

Reymond, C., Pelowski, M., Opwis, K., Takala, T., & Mekler, E. D. (2020). Aesthetic Evaluation of Digitally Reproduced Art Images. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.615575

Ritchi, F. (2009). After Photography.

Romele, A. (2022). Images of Artificial Intelligence: A Blind Spot in AI Ethics. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00498-3

Romele, A., & Severo, M. (2023). Microstock Images of Artificial Intelligence: How AI Creates Its Own Conditions of Possibility. Convergence the International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 29(5), 1226–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231199982

Rubinstein, D. (2019). Fractal Photography and the Politics of Invisibility.

Rubinstein, D., & Fisher, A. (2013). On the Verge of Photography: Imaging Beyond Representation. Article Press.

Smits, T. (2021). A Network of Photographs: The Visual Public Memory of the Dutch Provo Movement, 1967–2016. Memory Studies, 15(1), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980211037282

Spolaore, E. (2020). Commanding Nature by Obeying Her: A Review Essay on Joel Mokyr’s A Culture of Growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(3), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191460

Taffel, S. (2020). Google’s Lens: Computational Photography and Platform Capitalism. Media Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720939449

Van Essen, Y. E. (2020). From Photographic Representation to the ‘Photographic Genotype. Routledge.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-07-20

Como Citar

Simões, J. M., & Caldeira, W. (2024). Criatividade rizomática: Explorando os territórios inexplorados das imagens geradas por IA. [RMd] RevistaMultidisciplinar, 6(3), e202425. https://doi.org/10.23882/rmd.24228