Economic valuation of hydroelectric dams' safety

Evidence from France

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23882/rmd.24184

Keywords:

Dams, Hydraulic safety, Financial valuation, Cost avoided method

Abstract

This paper aims to develop an economic approach that enables electricity generation companies to analyze and quantify the economic gains of complicated activities particularly the safety of hydroelectric dams. The method is based on calculating the costs avoided due to the implementation of safety mechanism. The specification of this method is founded on a solid literature regarding the economic assessment of the monetary value of complicated services. The results of this paper highlight the importance and the significant influence of safety activities in reducing costs, reaching approximately 26 million Euros. The results also shed light on the importance of the safety device to fight fatal accidents and ensure public security.

References

Alberini, A. (2005). What is a life worth? Robustness of VSL values from contingent valuation surveys. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(4), 783-800.

Ashenfelter, O. (2006). Measuring the value of a statistical life: problems and prospects. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C10-C23.

Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment.

Barthélémy, F., Martin, X., & Nicolazo, J. L. (2004). La réglementation en matière de sécurité des barrages et des digues. Conseil général des mines.

Bateman, I. J., & Willis, K. G. (Eds.). (2001). Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Blomquist, G. C. (2004). Self-protection and averting behavior, values of statistical lives, and benefit cost analysis of environmental policy. Review of Economics of the Household, 2(1), 89-110.

Bowles, D. S., Anderson, L. R., & Glover, T. F. (1998). The practice of dam safety risk assessment and management: Its roots, its branches, and its fruit. In its Roots, its Branches, and its Fruit. Proceedings of USCOLD 1998 Annual Lecture.

Boxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L., Swait, J., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological economics, 18(3), 243-253.

Brown, C. A., & Graham, W. J. (1988). ASSESSING THE THREAT TO LIFE FROM DAM FAILURE 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 24(6), 1303-1309.

Carlsson, F., & Martinsson, P. (2001). Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41(2), 179-192.

Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., & Meade, N. F. (2001). Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and resource economics, 19(2), 173-210.

Cheng, S. T. (1993). Statistics of dam failure. Reliability and uncertainty analysis in hydraulic design. ASCE, New York, 97-105.

Cost, E. U. R. O. C. O. N. T. R. O. L. (2013). Standard Inputs for EUROCONTROL Cost Benefit Analyses.

De Blaeij, A., Florax, R. J., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. (2003). The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(6), 973-986.

DeKay, M. L., & McClelland, G. H. (1993). Predicting loss of life in cases of dam failure and flash flood. Risk Analysis, 13(2), 193-205.

Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of economic perspectives, 8(4), 19-43.

Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and resource economics, 11(3-4), 413-428.

Hartford, D. N., & Baecher, G. B. (2004). Risk and uncertainty in dam safety. Thomas Telford.

LaBelle, J. E. (2000). What do accidents truly cost? Professional Safety, 45(4), 38.

Persson, U., Norinder, A., Hjalte, K., & Gralén, K. (2001). The value of a statistical life in transport: findings from a new contingent valuation study in Sweden. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(2), 121-134.

Rico, M., Benito, G., Salgueiro, A. R., Díez-Herrero, A., & Pereira, H. G. (2008). Reported tailings dam failures: a review of the European incidents in the worldwide context. Journal of hazardous materials, 152(2), 846-852.

Salmon, G. M., & Hartford, D. N. D. (1995). Risk analysis for dam safety. In International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 6(32), 284A.

Seed, H. B., Lee, K. L., & Idriss, I. M. (1969). Analysis of Sheffield dam failure. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div.

Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 27(1), 5-76.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-02

How to Cite

Malzi, M. J., Belhaj , N., & Koraich , A. (2024). Economic valuation of hydroelectric dams’ safety: Evidence from France. [RMd] RevistaMultidisciplinar, 6(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.23882/rmd.24184