ICT, hyperconnectivity and digital domestication
Toward a critical theory of work-family boundaries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23882/rmd.26325Keywords:
Hyperconnectivity, work-family, ICT, digital domesticationAbstract
This paper develops a critical theoretical framework to examine the erosion of work-family boundaries in digitally hyperconnected contexts mediated by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Drawing on the concept of digital domestication, it analyzes how workers incorporate and reinterpret ICTs in everyday routines, normalizing constant availability as an organizational expectation. The literature review identifies technoference, symbolic surveillance, and moralized self-management of time as mechanisms associated with negative impacts on psychosocial well-being and recovery processes. The study proposes a conceptual agenda that challenges functionalist assumptions and critically rethinks organizational practices in hybrid work environments.
References
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. SAGE Publications.
Andrade, C., & Matias, M. (2022). Work-related ICT use during off-job time, technology to family conflict and segmentation preference: A study with two generations of employees. Information, Communication & Society, 25(14), 2162–2171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1933564
Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cho, S., Kim, S., Chin, S. W., & Ahmad, U. (2020). Daily effects of continuous ICT demands on work–family conflict: Negative spillover and role conflict. Stress and Health, 36(4), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2955
Day, A., Barber, L. K., & Tonet, J. (2021). Information communication technology and employee well-being: Understanding the “iParadox Triad” at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 642211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642211
Farivar, F., & Richardson, J. (2021). Workplace digitalisation and work-nonwork satisfaction: The role of spillover social media. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(8), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1723702
Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Valle, M., Carlson, J. R., Carlson, D. S., & Zivnuska, S. (2022). Technostress and the entitled employee: Impacts on work and family. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0348
Jabri, M. (2012). Transformational leadership and organizational change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kalischko, T., & Riedl, R. (2021). Electronic performance monitoring in the digital workplace: Conceptualization, review of effects and moderating factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 633031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633031
Kao, K.-Y., Chi, N.-W., Thomas, C. L., Lee, H.-T., & Wang, Y.-F. (2020). Linking ICT availability demands to burnout and work-family conflict: The roles of workplace telepressure and dispositional self-regulation. The Journal of Psychology, 154(5), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2020.1745137
Leonardi, P. M. (2021). COVID-19 and the new technologies of organizing: Digital exhaust, digital footprints, and artificial intelligence in the wake of remote work. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12648
MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
McDaniel, B. T., O’Connor, K., & Drouin, M. (2021). Work-related technoference at home: Examining the spillover of work to family life. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 14(5), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-11-2020-0197
Messenger, J. C., Vargas Llave, O., Gschwind, L., Boehmer, S., Vermeylen, G., & Wilkens, M. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Eurofound and International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_544138/lang--en/index.htm
Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during COVID-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Page, K. J., Nastasi, A., & Voyles, E. C. (2021). Mediating effects of strain and work-family conflict on the relationship between work-related technology use and work-life balance. Stress and Health, 37(5), 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3052
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Park, Y., Liu, Y., & Headrick, L. (2020). When work is around the clock: Testing the effect of work-related smartphone use on psychological detachment and work-family conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(6), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2461
Shi, S., Chen, Y., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2023). How technostressors influence job and family satisfaction: Exploring the role of work-family conflict. Information Systems Journal, 33(4), 953–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12431
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924
Suddaby, R. (2010). Constructing the logic of theoretical contribution. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok346
Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton University Press.
Tochia, C. (2021). How the digital workforce has re-defined boundary management (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton). University of Southampton Repository. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/456991/
Van Zoonen, W., Sivunen, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020). Boundary communication: How smartphone use after hours is associated with work-life conflict and organizational identification. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(3), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1755050
Vayre, E., & Vonthron, A.-M. (2019). Identifying work-related internet’s uses—at work and outside usual workplaces and hours—and their relationships with work–home interface, work engagement, and problematic internet behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02118
Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308376
Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Peters, P., & Tsui, A. S. (2019). Work-family boundary management and segmentation preferences in the digital era. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00834
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adeylson Felix Loureiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
