TIC, hiperconectividad y domesticación digital
Hacia una teoría crítica de las fronteras trabajo-familia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23882/rmd.26325Palavras-chave:
Hiperconectividad, trabajo-familia, TIC, domesticación digitalResumo
Este artículo propone un marco crítico para comprender la erosión de las fronteras entre trabajo y familia en contextos de hiperconectividad digital mediada por Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC). A partir del concepto de domesticación digital, se analizan las formas en que los trabajadores incorporan y resignifican las TIC en sus rutinas cotidianas, naturalizando la disponibilidad permanente como exigencia organizacional. La revisión teórica evidencia procesos de tecnointerferencia, vigilancia simbólica y autogestión moralizada del tiempo, asociados a impactos sobre el bienestar psicosocial y la calidad del descanso. Se propone así una agenda analítica que cuestiona enfoques funcionalistas y problematiza las dinámicas organizacionales en escenarios híbridos.
Referências
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. SAGE Publications.
Andrade, C., & Matias, M. (2022). Work-related ICT use during off-job time, technology to family conflict and segmentation preference: A study with two generations of employees. Information, Communication & Society, 25(14), 2162–2171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1933564
Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cho, S., Kim, S., Chin, S. W., & Ahmad, U. (2020). Daily effects of continuous ICT demands on work–family conflict: Negative spillover and role conflict. Stress and Health, 36(4), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2955
Day, A., Barber, L. K., & Tonet, J. (2021). Information communication technology and employee well-being: Understanding the “iParadox Triad” at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 642211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642211
Farivar, F., & Richardson, J. (2021). Workplace digitalisation and work-nonwork satisfaction: The role of spillover social media. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(8), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1723702
Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Valle, M., Carlson, J. R., Carlson, D. S., & Zivnuska, S. (2022). Technostress and the entitled employee: Impacts on work and family. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0348
Jabri, M. (2012). Transformational leadership and organizational change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kalischko, T., & Riedl, R. (2021). Electronic performance monitoring in the digital workplace: Conceptualization, review of effects and moderating factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 633031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633031
Kao, K.-Y., Chi, N.-W., Thomas, C. L., Lee, H.-T., & Wang, Y.-F. (2020). Linking ICT availability demands to burnout and work-family conflict: The roles of workplace telepressure and dispositional self-regulation. The Journal of Psychology, 154(5), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2020.1745137
Leonardi, P. M. (2021). COVID-19 and the new technologies of organizing: Digital exhaust, digital footprints, and artificial intelligence in the wake of remote work. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12648
MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
McDaniel, B. T., O’Connor, K., & Drouin, M. (2021). Work-related technoference at home: Examining the spillover of work to family life. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 14(5), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-11-2020-0197
Messenger, J. C., Vargas Llave, O., Gschwind, L., Boehmer, S., Vermeylen, G., & Wilkens, M. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Eurofound and International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_544138/lang--en/index.htm
Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during COVID-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Page, K. J., Nastasi, A., & Voyles, E. C. (2021). Mediating effects of strain and work-family conflict on the relationship between work-related technology use and work-life balance. Stress and Health, 37(5), 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3052
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Park, Y., Liu, Y., & Headrick, L. (2020). When work is around the clock: Testing the effect of work-related smartphone use on psychological detachment and work-family conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(6), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2461
Shi, S., Chen, Y., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2023). How technostressors influence job and family satisfaction: Exploring the role of work-family conflict. Information Systems Journal, 33(4), 953–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12431
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924
Suddaby, R. (2010). Constructing the logic of theoretical contribution. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok346
Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton University Press.
Tochia, C. (2021). How the digital workforce has re-defined boundary management (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton). University of Southampton Repository. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/456991/
Van Zoonen, W., Sivunen, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020). Boundary communication: How smartphone use after hours is associated with work-life conflict and organizational identification. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(3), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1755050
Vayre, E., & Vonthron, A.-M. (2019). Identifying work-related internet’s uses—at work and outside usual workplaces and hours—and their relationships with work–home interface, work engagement, and problematic internet behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02118
Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308376
Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Peters, P., & Tsui, A. S. (2019). Work-family boundary management and segmentation preferences in the digital era. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00834
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Adeylson Felix Loureiro
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
